Ponnan v. Elsy
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition, the husband challenged the execution of a settlement deed, objecting to the amount paid and the lack of a joint divorce petition. The court held these objections lacked merit, dismissing the writ petition and upholding the Family Court order.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed with no relief granted to the petitioner.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
MONDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2008 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1930
WP(C).No. 33969 of 2008(S)
-------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER DATED / / IN EP 29/08 IN OP.1406/2004 of FAMILY COURT,ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER(S):
PONNAN, S/O.LATE VELAYUDHAN, AGED 58 YEARS, PULIYASSERI HOUSE, NOW RESIDING AT C/O RAMASWAMY, KATTUPRAMBIL HOUSE, PUSHPAKARA ROAD, T.K.C. CROSS ROAD, VADUTHALA,KOCHI-28
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.R.DIVAKARAN SRI.VINUCHAND
RESPONDENT(S):
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has sufficient grounds for challenging the execution of a settlement deed after compromise.
Whether currency in the compromise between Rs.4 lakhs and Rs.5 lakhs can be reopened.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ponnan
- respondent
Elsy
- respondent
Princy
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court