The Single Judge dismissed two writ petitions fixing the matter for further hearing in a designated connected writ petition, preserving all rights of the parties.
Writ petitions dismissed; rights preserved for consideration in WP(C) 17824/2008.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 28TH OCTOBER 2008 / 6TH KARTHIKA 1930
WP(C).No. 22688 of 2007(A)
---------------------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------
ANTONY ISSAC, AGED 58 YEARS, MAVUTHARA, KAINADY P.O., KAVALAM VILLAGE, KUTTANAD TALUK, ALAPPEY DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.GEORGE CHERIAN (THIRUVALLA)
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------
1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPUZHA.
2. THE TAHSILDAR (RR) KUTTANAD, MANCOMBU, ALAPPEY DISTRICT.
3. TONY ABRAHAM, PUTHENPURAYIL, KAINADY P.O., KUTTANAD, ALLEPPEY DISTRICT.
4. LAL T.MONEY, RAMANILAYAM, KAINADY P.O., ALLEPPEY DISTRICT.
ADV. SRI.A.N.RAJAN BABU FOR R4
SMT.K.SUNITHA VINOD FOR R4 SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNAN (MVA) FOR R4 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD FOR R1 & 2
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C) NO. 22688/2007
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS EXHIBITS
P1:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT. 21.1.1989 IN OS. NO.762/82 OF HE MUNSIFF'S COURT, ALAPPUZHA.
P2:- COPY OF THE NOTICE DT. 27.8.06 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
P3:- COPY OF THE SALE DEED DT. 16.9.01.
P4:- COPY OF THE DECREE DT. 21.1.1989 IN OS. NO. 762/82 OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, ALAPPUZHA.
P5:- COPY OF THE APPLICATION DT. 15.11.06.
P6:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT. 7.12.06 IN WPC. NO.32116/06.
P7:- COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 6.12.06 FROM THE IST RESPONDENT.
P7(a):- COPY OF THE ENVELOPE IN WHICH EXT.P7 IS SENT .
P8:- COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 28.12.06 OF THE RDO .
P9:- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DT. 4.4.07 IN WPC. NO.34367/06.
P10:- COPY OF THE PETITION DT. 11.5.07 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT.
P11:- COPY OF THE ORDER DT. 23.5.07 OF THE IST RESPONDENT .
P11(a):- COPY OF THE ENVELOPE IN WHICH EXT.P11 IS SENT.
/ TRUE COPY/
P.S. TO JUDGE
tss
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
W.P.(C).Nos.22688 of 2007-A & 15242 of 2007-M
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 28th day of October, 2008.
JUDGMENT
After hearing the learned counsel for parties, these writ petitions are dismissed preserving all the rights of parties for consideration in WP(C). 17824/2008.
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, JUDGE. Sha/291008
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitions should be disposed of or remanded for final consideration in a connected matter.
Antony Issac
The District Collector, Alappuzha
The Tahsildar (RR) Kuttanad
Tony Abraham
Lal T.Money
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
