Thankamma v. Mohadeen Kunju
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court directed the Sub Judge at Neyyattinkara to dispose of appeal A.S. 90/2003 expeditiously due to the backlog of cases pending since 2000 under Article 227.
What did the court decide?
Director the Sub Judge to dispose of A.S. 90 of 2003 as expeditiously as possible.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2008 / 4TH ASHADHA 1930
WP(C).No. 22615 of 2006(P)
-------------------------AS.90/2003 of SUB COURT,NEYYATTINKARA ....................
PETITIONERS:
- THANKAMMA, W/O.LATE THAPASIMUTHU NADAR, THENGUVILAKOM PURAYIDOM, DEVAPURAM BUNGLOW, KARODE P.O., NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
- THOMAS NADAR, S/O. LATE THAPASIMUTHU NADAR, THENGUVILAKOM PURAYIDOM, DEVAPURAM BUNGLOW, KARODE P.O., NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.M.SREEKUMAR
RESPONDENT: -------------
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Sub Judge should be directed to dispose of the pending appeal expeditiously.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Thankamma
- petitioner
Thomas Nadar
- respondent
Mohadeen Kunju
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court