C.Murali v. Commissioner Hr & Ce,Dept.Kkd.
Case brief
What is this about?
This petition alleged private fund collection by respondents 3 and 4. After an enquiry showed some allegations were true and funds were retrieved and deposited, the Court closed the writ petition while allowing the petitioner to report future irregularities.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to bring any future irregularity to the notice of the Commissioner; petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
MONDAY, THE 4TH AUGUST 2008 / 13TH SRAVANA 1930
WP(C).No. 13860 of 2006(Y)
PETITIONER:
C. MURALI, S/O. GOVINDAN, CHETTIKKAL (H), VAZHAKKULAM (VIA), MALAPPURAM-676 508.
BY ADV. SMT.G.SUMA
RESPONDENTS:
- THE COMMISSIONER,
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should close a civil writ petition alleging private fund collection by temple representatives after an enquiry suggests funds were retrieved and deposited.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C. Murali
- respondent
The Commissioner, HR & CE, Administration Department
- respondent
Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Department
- respondent
Vennyur Siva Kshetra Karma Samithy
- respondent
Ayyappa Bajana Samithy
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court