Dismissed

D.Obbayya Naik v. the Joint Registrar

Kerala HC22 Aug 2008WP(C)/132/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court disposed of a writ petition regarding recovery steps initiated by the respondent Bank, directing the petitioner to approach the Bank directly if grievances persist and allowing recovery proceedings if unhonoured.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed with direction to approach the Bank for grievances; bank permitted to proceed with recovery if petitioner does not cooperate.

D.Obbayya Naik Vs the Joint Registrar — Cooperative Societies | Kerala HC (2008)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 22ND AUGUST 2008 / 31ST SRAVANA 1930

¶5

WP(C).No. 132 of 2006(N)

¶6

-----------------------------------

¶7

PETITIONER:

¶8

------------------

¶9

D. OBBAYA NAIK, S/O. GOVINDA NAIK, DERBADUKKA, MANIMOOLA P.O., BANDADKA VILLAGE, KASARAGOD.

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.T.B.SHAJIMON

¶11

RESPONDENTS:

¶12

------------------------

¶13

1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF SECRETARY, CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, KASARAGOD.

¶14

2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR/ARBITRATOR-CUMSALES OFFICER, THE KASARAGOD DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., KASARAGOD.

¶15

3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, KASARAGOD DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., BANDADKA BRANCH, KASARAGOD.

¶16

4. THE KASARAGOD DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., KASARAGOD, REP. BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER.

¶17

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MUHAMMED ANZAR

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

W.P.(C) NO.132/2006

¶20

APPENDIX

¶21

PETITIONERS EXHIBITS

¶22

EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE AWARD IS PRODUCED HERE IN AND MARKED . EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE SALE NOTICE IS PRODUCED HERE IN AND MARKED. EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION IS PRODUCED HERE IN AND MARKED.

/ TRUE COPY/

P.A. TO JUDGE

tss

KURIAN JOSEPH, J.

¶27

--------------------------------------W.P.(C) No.132 OF 2006

¶28

Dated this the 22^nd day of August, 2008.

¶29

J U D G M E N T

¶30

The issue raised in this writ petition pertains to the recovery steps initiated by the respondent-Bank. In view of the intervening developments in case the petitioner has still any grievance left, he may approach the Bank itself. It is made clear that in case the petitioner does not co-operate with the Bank in settling the matter, it will be open to the Bank to proceed with the recovery.

¶31

This writ petition is disposed of as above.

¶32

KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.

¶33

smp

¶34

KURIAN JOSEPH, J.

¶35

W.P.(C) No. 132 OF 2006

¶36

J U D G M E N T

¶37

22.08.2008

D.Obbayya Naik v. the Joint Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Obbayya Naik v. the Joint Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.K.Ravindran Vs the Chief Engineer (Road & Bridge)Pwd

M.v.Ganesh Vs Muvattupuzha Municipality

Aghin Thahir Vs the Tahsildar, Vythiri Taluk

A.R.Nagar Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Vs the Director

Shibu Vs the Kerala Co-Operative Tribunal

Kuriakose Vs Jt.Registrar,Co.Op.Societies,Painav,Iduk