A.v.Sulochana v. the State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala rejected this writ appeal for not being argued on merits. However, relying on a direction from the lower court permitting a representation, the Court directed the respondent bank authorities to consider such a representation filed by the appellant within a month.
What did the court decide?
The appellant is permitted to make an appropriate representation to the respondent authorities within one month; such representation shall be considered in accordance with law.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH
TUESDAY, THE 8TH JANUARY 2008 / 18TH POUSHA 1929
WA.No. 1585 of 2005
AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.24351/2001 Dated 24/08/2004
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
A.V.SULOCHANA, W/O.LATE K.V.BALACHANDRAN, KANDAMCHALIL HOUSE, P.O.KAVUMBHAGOM,
THALASSERY-1.
BY ADV. SRI.A.MOHAMED MUSTAQUE
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
- ----------------------------------------------1. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant is entitled to a direction to the respondent authorities to consider a representation filed by them in accordance with law.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
A.V.Sulochana
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
H.L. Dattu
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court