The court noted that the appellant failed to cure defects despite sufficient opportunities. Consequently, the second appeal was dismissed for default as no steps were taken to proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DECEMBER 2008 / 19TH AGRAHAYANA 1930
SA.No. 976 of 1996()
-------------------AS.55/1994 of SUB COURT,NEYYATTINKARA OS.459/1985 of II ADDL.M.C.,NEYYATTINKARA
APPELLANT:
--------------------ALWIZ SOMAN, THETTUVARAMBU PUTHEN VEEDU, ARUMANOOR DESOM, THIRUPURAM VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH
SRI.R.S.KALKURA SRI.M.RAMASWAMY
RESPONDENT(S):
ADV. SRI.L.MOHANAN SRI.D.SAJEEV
THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = S.A.No.976 of 1996
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 10th day of December, 2008
JUDGMENT
No steps were taken by the appellant to cure the defects in spite of sufficient opportunities were given. On 5.12.08 this Court posted the case for disposal today. Still, no steps have been taken and there is no representation also. Hence, this second appeal is dismissed for default.
Dated this the 10th day of December, 2008.
V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE
sj
Alwiz Soman
Appiyana Nadar
V. Ramkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
