Vaeghese v. Mathai
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala disposed of three second appeals as abated after accepting evidence that the appellants died in 1998 and 2000 respectively, with no legal representatives prosecuting the matters.
What did the court decide?
All second appeals (S.A. Nos. 598, 602, and 605 of 1998) dismissed as they were abated due to death of appellants.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 1ST JULY 2008 / 10TH ASHADHA 1930
SA.No.598 of 1998 (D)
-------------------------AS.83/1992 of ADDL.DISTRICT COURT,KOTTAYAM OS.91/1986 of MUNSIFF COURT, CHANGANACHERRY
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
---------------------------------------------
VARGHESE, S/O VARGHESE, THEKKUMBHAGOM, CHENGATTU, KANGAZHA MURI, KANGAZHA VILLAGE.
BY ADV. SRI.JOHN VARGHESE
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS 2 & 4:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeals should be disposed of as abated due to the death of the appellants without their legal representatives appearing.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
VARGHESE, S/O VARGHESE
- respondent
MATHAI, S/O MATHAI
- respondent
SARAMMA MATHAI, W/O MATHAI
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court