This is a supplemental second appeal filed by four appellants against orders of the subordinate courts at Hosdurg. The High Court of Kerala dismissed the appeal simply because the learned counsel for the appellants reported 'no instructions' during the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
MONDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2008 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1930
SA.No. 45 of 1997(E)
-------------------OS.36/1988 of MUNSIFF's COURT, HOSDRUG AS.36/1991 of SUB COURT, HOSDRUG
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS:-
BY ADV. SRI.K.SHRIHARI RAO SRI.K.R.RAGHUNATH
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDENTS:-
S.A. No. 45/1997
: 2:
SUPPLEMENTAL
S.A. No. 45/1997 : 3:
ADV. SRI.A.P.CHANDRASEKHARAN (SR.) SRI.KODOTH SREEDHARAN FOR
THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
======================= S.A. No. 45 of 1997
========================
Dated this the 1st day of December, 2008.
JUDGMENT
When this appeal came up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants reports “no instructions”. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Dated this the 1st day of December, 2008.
V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.
rv
V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.
S.A. No. 45 of 1997
J U D G M E N T
Dated 1st day of December, 2008.
Narayani
Pachu
K. Latha
K. Sarojini
C.H. Madhavi
K.R. Vijayan
V. RAMKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
