Nandakumar v. Louis
Case brief
What is this about?
In a regular second appeal against a concurrent judgment in a suit for recovery of money, the appellant prayed for four months' time to discharge the debt as the appeal merit was not canvassed. The court dismissed the appeal in limine but granted the four months' time.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed in limine with four months' time granted to discharge the entire debt.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 1ST SEPTEMBER 2008 / 10TH BHADRA 1930
RSA.No. 391 of 2008
----------------------AS.155/2003 of PRL.SUB COURT,IRINJALAKUDA OS.1662/2002 of ADDL.M.C.,IRINJALAKUDA
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT
NANDAKUMAR, AGED 48, S/O.SANKUNNY, PALAKKAL HOUSE, NEAR PATHANAPURAM TEMPLE, THANISSERY DESOM, MANAVALASSERY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH)
RESPONDENT: RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF
LOUIS, S/O.POULOSE, MALIEKKAL HOUSE, IRINJALAKUDA DESOM, MANAVALASSERY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow time to discharge debt to dismiss appeal in money recovery suit
Parties & counsel
- appellant
NANDAKUMAR
- respondent
LOUIS
Coram
K.P.BALACHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court