Valsala v. T.F Joseph
Case brief
What is this about?
In this Second Appeal arising from an injunction suit and execution petition, the High Court of Kerala held that since the question of property identity was already decided in the suit, the appellants cannot re-agitate it in execution proceedings.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal is dismissed; the execution of the decree for removal of steps must proceed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
MONDAY, THE 15TH DECEMBER 2008 / 24TH AGRAHAYANA 1930
RSA.No. 1209 of 2008()
---------------------AS.93/2008 of II ADDL.DISTRICT COURT,ERNAKULAM OS.1356/2001 of PRL. MUNSIFF'S COURT,ERNAKULAM
APPELLANTS/JUDGMENT DEBTORS/DEFENDANTS 1 TO 4:-
- VALSALA, D/O.LATE VARGHESE, KADAVIL HOUSE, SYRIAN CHURCH ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-31.
- JOHN, S/O.LATE VARGHESE, KADAVIL HOUSE SYRIAN CHURCH ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-31.
- BABY, D/O.LATE VARGHESE, KADAVIL HOUSE SYRIAN CHURCH ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-31.
- JOMON, S/O.LATE VARGHESE, KADAVIL HOUSE SYRIAN CHURCH ROAD, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-31.
BY ADV. SRI.T.K.KURIKESU
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an execution petition can be filed when there is no proper identity of the property mentioned in the decree.
Whether the appellants can re-agitate the question of identity of property in execution after deciding it in the suit.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
VALSALA, D/O.LATE VARGHESE
- appellant
JOHN, S/O.LATE VARGHESE
- appellant
BABY, D/O.LATE VARGHESE
- appellant
JOMON, S/O.LATE VARGHESE
- respondent
T.F.JOSEPH, S/O.CHEEKAMMA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court