Chola Sahida v. Thrikkariyoor Devaswom and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court reviewed a brief order in response to a review petition filed by Chola Sahida. The bench found sufficient cause for the petitioner's counsel not attending the hearing on the specified date and directed the recall of the earlier judgment to recall the need for case records. This single-paragraph order addresses only the procedural adjournment of the review petition hearing.
What did the court decide?
Recall the judgment dated 16.01.2008 to post the writ petition for hearing and call for records from Land Tribunal, Malappuram.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 18TH MARCH 2008 / 28TH PHALGUNA 1929 RP.No. 340 of 2008(F) --------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.16438/2005 Dated 16/01/2008 ....................
PETITIONER
CHOLA SAHIDA,D/O. AHAMMEDKUTTY HAJI KEESHUPARAMBA AMSOM AND DESOM, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.SAJU.S.A
RESPONDENTS:
- THRIKKARIYOOR DEVASWOM,,REPRESENTED BY EXECUTIVE OFFICER, K.BALAJI S/O. P.K. KARUNAKARA MENON,MANJERI AMSOM AND DESOM,ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
- THRIKKARIYOOR DEVASWOM,,,FIT PERSONS THONNATH CHERIYAKKAN MASTER,S/O. UNNEERIKUTTY KEEZHUPARAMBA AMSOM AND DESOM, ERNAD TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
- STATE OF KERALA,REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECREATIRIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause existed to allow the review petition hearing despite the counsel's absence?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
CHOLA SAHIDA
- respondent
THRIKKARIYOOR DEVASWOM
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court