for the review petitioner, Mr.A.M.Shaffique, counsel for the 5th respondent and Smt.P.Vani, counsel for the 1st respondent. Having regard to the submissions addressed by the learned counsel, I am of the view that there is justification for modifying my judgment dated 12.2.2008. Accordingly, I allow the R.P. recording that even on 12.2.2008 when the judgment was delivered by me, the construction of the towers had been completed and that the respondents 3 and 4 were energising the towers. Therefore the directions in the judgment that respondents 3 and 4 shall not energise the towers before separate orders in that regard issued by the 2nd respondent is deleted and it is made clear that the energisation of the towers by respondents 3 to 5 will be subject to the orders to be passed by the 2nd respondent pursuant to the hearing which is directed to be conducted as per the judgment dated 12.2.2008. The judgment is modified only to the above extent and in all other respects the directions in the judgment will continue.