Dismissed

Dr.Sreedevi K.Nair v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC22 Feb 2008OP/2858/1999

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

this court disposed of a writ petition wherein the petitioner approached the court aggrieved by a communication from the Deputy Director of Collegiate Education. the court directed the petitioner to approach the fourth respondent for appropriate action within three months.

What did the court decide?

petitioner directed to approach the fourth respondent who shall consider the matter and take appropriate action within three months.

Dr.Sreedevi K.Nair Vs State of Kerala — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Kerala HC (2008)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 22ND FEBRUARY 2008 / 3RD PHALGUNA 1929

¶5

OP.No. 2858 of 1999(M)

¶6

--------------------------------PETITIONER:

¶7

------------------DR.SREEDEVI K.NAIR, LECTURER, DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH, N.S.S. COLLEGE FOR WOMEN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, RESIDING AT 'SREENIKETH', T.C. 17/1759, NETHAJI ROAD, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 012.

¶8

BY ADV. SRI.P.SUKUMARAN NAYAR(SR.) SRI.P.V.RAMESH SHANKAR SRI.G.P.SHINOD SRI.G.UNNIKRISHNON

¶9

RESPONDENTS:

¶10

-----------------------

¶11

1. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶12

2. THE SECRETARY, N.S.S COLLEGE CENTRAL COMMITTEE, CHANGANASSERY.

¶13

3. PRINCIPAL N.S.S. COLLEGE OF WOMEN, NENMARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA 695 040.

¶14

4. DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, VIKHAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶15

5. DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, KOLLAM.

¶16

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BENJAMIN PAUL

¶17

THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

OP. NO.2858/1999

¶19

ORDER ON CMP. NO.4837/1999 IN OP. NO.2858/1999

¶20

DISMISSED

¶21

22.02.2008

¶22

SD/- KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE

¶23

APPENDIX

¶24

PETITIONERS EXHIBITS

¶25

EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.UGC CELL. I(2) 33606/94 (4) DT. 19.1.96 ISSUED BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT.

¶26

EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE FORM FOR EXERCISING OPTION UNDER THE U.G.C. SCALE OF PAY DT. 29.3.96 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

¶27

EXT.P3:- COPY OF THE PROFORMA FOR PAY FIXATION DT. 1.4.96 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER.

¶28

EXT.P4:- COPY OF THE INCREMENT CERTIFICATE IN RESPECT of the PETITIONER DT. 1.4.96.

¶29

EXT.P4(a):- COPY OF THE INCREMENT CERTIFICATE (FORM T.R. 53)

¶30

EXT.P5:- COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DT. 14.3.95 ADDRESSED TO THE FOURTH RESPONDENT FROM THE THIRD RESPONDENT.

¶31

EXT.P6:- COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DT. 29.6.98 SENT BY THE FIFTH RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

/ TRUE COPY/

P.A. TO JUDGE

tss

KURIAN JOSEPH, J.

¶36

---------------------------------------

¶37

O.P. No. 2858 OF 1999

¶38

Dated this the 22^nd day of February, 2008.

¶39

J U D G M E N T

¶40

Petitioner approached this Court aggrieved by Exhibit P6 communication of the Deputy Director of Collegiate Education. In case the petitioner has still any grievance left, she may approach the fourth respondent, in which case, the matter will be duly considered by the fourth respondent and appropriate action in accordance with law will be taken, with notice to the petitioner and second respondent, within a period of another three months.

¶41

This original petition is disposed of as above.

¶42

KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.

¶43

smp

¶44

KURIAN JOSEPH, J.

¶45

O.P. No. 2858 OF 1999

¶46

J U D G M E N T

¶47

22.02.2008

Dr.Sreedevi K.Nair v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr.Sreedevi K.Nair v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yarkose Abraham Vs v.M.Varghese

State of Kerala Vs v.v.Rugmini

The Managing Director,Ksidc,Tvm. Vs Kurumpa Parvathy

Cherian K.George Vs P.Babu

The Ottapalam Co.Op. Markeing Soc. Ltd. Vs the Dist. Collector.,Palakkad

P.K.Sudhi Vs the State of Kerala