P. Kamalam v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
A nursing staff member challenged disciplinary orders imposing barring of increment and rejection of an appeal. The court held the orders violated natural justice as they failed to address the petitioner's explanations or state reasons, violating Rule 16.
What did the court decide?
The impugned orders Exts. P3 and P7 are quashed. The respondent is directed to pass fresh orders after addressing the allegations and the petitioner's explanation.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
TUESDAY, THE 21ST OCTOBER 2008 / 29TH ASWINA 1930
OP.No. 27278 of 2000(V) -----------------------
PETITIONER(S):
P. KAMALAM, NURSING SUPERINTENDENT GR.II, GOVT. HOSPITAL, KOZHIMJAMPARA, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD.
BY ADV. SRI.H.BADARUDDIN
RESPONDENT(S):
- STATE OF KERALA,REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT. HEALTH & F.W.(C) DEPARTMENT, GOVT, OF KERALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
- THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL SERVICES (MEDICAL), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether disciplinary and appellate orders imposing punishment without discussing the petitioner's contentions violate principles of natural justice?
Whether the impugned orders are non-speaking orders lacking reasoning and thus non-conforming to the relevant Rules?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. KAMALAM
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
THE DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL SERVICES
- respondent
THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court