Sheela v. Basheer
Case brief
What is this about?
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Muvattupuzha, dismissed connected appeals seeking enhancement or reduction of compensation for death and injuries resulting from a motor accident. The court held evidence was insufficient to alter the quantum.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH AUGUST 2008 / 22ND SRAVANA 1930
MACA.No. 504 of 2003()
---------------------OPMV.716/1999 of MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, MUVATTUPUZHA
APPELLANTS.
- SHEELA, W/O.LATE SRI.TONY,
- EDAKKATTUKUDIYIL HOUSE, VARAPPETTY KARA, VARAPEETY VILLAGE.
- AMEL DEV TONY, S/O.LATE SRI.TONY, EDAKKATTUKUDYIL HOUSE, VARAPPETTY KARA, VARAPEETY VILLAGE.
- BALURAJ TONY, S/O.LATE SRI.TONY, EDAKKAT TUKUDYIYIL HOUSE, VARAPPETTY KARA, VARAPPETTY VILLAGE.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal for death and injuries in the motor accident needs enhancement or reduction.
Whether there was sufficient evidence to prove the deceased's income for calculation of compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
SHEELA
- appellant
AMEL DEV TONY
- appellant
BALURAJ TONY
- appellant
ANNA TONY
- appellant
E.J.VARKEY
- appellant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court