The High Court of Kerala dismissed an appeal in a land acquisition matter, noting that the connected cases had already been dismissed by this court in earlier judgments, consequently dismissing the present appeal and a connected interim application.
Appeal L.A.A.No.572 of 2003 and I.A.No.401/2003 dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID TUESDAY, THE 19TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 30TH MAGHA 1929
LA.App..No. 572 of 2003() ------------------------LAR.81/1999 of PRL.SUB COURT, KASARAGODE ....................
APPELLANT: RESPONDENT
STATE OF KERALA.
BY SRI.V.K.BEERAN, ADDL.ADVOCATE GENERAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.K.V.MANOJKUMAR.
RESPONDENTS: CLAIMANT
ABDULLAKUNHI S/O. KOTE ABBAS, RESIDING AT POVVAL, NELLIKKAD, MULIYAR VILLAGE AND POST, KASARAGOD TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN SMT.S.AMINA
THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 19/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
KURIAN JOSEPH & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ.
L.A.A.No.572 of 2003
Dated this the 19th day of February, 2008
JUDGMENT
Kurian Joseph,J.
This appeal is filed against the judgment and decree in L.A.R.No.81/1999 on the file of the Sub Court, Kasaragod. It is seen that the connected cases covered by the common judgment have already been dismissed by this court by judgment in L.A.A.Nos.200/2003 and 1345/2003. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. I.A.No.401/2003 is also dismissed.
(KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE)
(HARUN-UL-RASHID, JUDGE)
ahg.
KURIAN JOSEPH & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ.
L.A.A.No.572 of 2003
JUDGMENT
19th February, 2008
STATE OF KERALA
ABDULLAKUNHI S/O. KOTE ABBAS
KURIAN JOSEPH
HARUN-UL-RASHID
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
