Raman v. Ravi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed the revision petition challenging the order of the Sub Court denying an application to set aside a Commissioner's Report, holding the revision was devoid of merit as it aimed to prolong litigation.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 2ND DECEMBER 2008 / 11TH AGRAHAYANA 1930
CRP.No.854 of 2008 -----------------------OS.353/2004 of PRL.SUB COURT,THRISSUR ....................
REVN. PETITIONER/PETITIONER/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: -----------------------------------------------------------------------
RAMAN, AGED 70 YEARS, S/O. URUMBAN LAGTE PAPPU, CHJELAKOTTUKARA DESOM, CHEMBUKAVU VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.K.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN
RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS/DEFENDANT:-
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1. RAVI, AGED 55 YEARS, S/O. CHULLIPARAMBIL NANU, CHIYYARAM, VILLAGE AND DESOM, THRISSUR TALUK.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition challenging the dismissal of an interlocutory application to set aside a Commissioner's Report has merit.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAMAN
- respondent
RAVI
- respondent
DR. PRAVEEN
- respondent
CHERIYAN
- respondent
VALSALA
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court