This civil revision petition is preferred against the order of the Prl.Sub Court, Kottayam in E.P.No.212 of 1990 in LAR No.79 of 1985. The question that arises for determination in this case is regarding the nonawarding of interest on the amount of solatium. The court below extracted the decree and held that since there is no express provision and as it cannot be said that it is by implication allowed interest cannot be calculated on the solatium. This position has been clarified by the Apex Court in the decision reported in Gurpreet Singh v. Union of India(2006) 8 SCC 457). In paragraph 54 of the judgment the court made it clear that it is true that the execution court cannot go behind the decree. If, therefore, the claim for interest on solatium had been made and the same has been negatived either expressly or by necessary implication by the judgment or decree of the Reference Court or of the appellate court, the execution court will have necessarily to reject the claim for interest on solatium based on Sunder on the ground that the execution court cannot go behind the decree. But if the
