Narayanan Nair v. Joy Joseph
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
MONDAY, THE 14TH JULY 2008 / 23RD ASHADHA 1930
CRP.No. 536 of 2008()
--------------------AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20/06/2008 IN IA.1814/2008 IN OS.176/2008 of MUNSIFF COURT,MUVATTUPUZHA
REVN. PETITIONER:
NARAYANAN NAIR, LAKSHMI SADANAM, PINDIMANA KARA, PINDIMANA VILLAGE.
BY ADV. SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY
RESPONDENTS:
JOY JOSEPH, KAROTHU HOUSE, MALAYANKEEZHU KOTHAMANGALAM.
BY
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.
C.R.P.No.536 of 2008
Dated this the 14th July, 2008.
O R D E R
This revision is filed challenging the order passed in I.A.No.1814 of 2008 in O.S.No.176 of 2008, on the file of the Munsiff Court, Muvattupuzha. It is a petition for joint trial of O.S.No.176 of 2008 & O.S.No.5 of 2008. Even if the revision and I.A. 1814 of 2008 are to be allowed and a joint trial is to be ordered, it will not finally dispose the suit. In such circumstances, as provided under proviso to Sub-section (1) of Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, no revision will lie. Hence, petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order in appropriate proceedings.
M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, JUDGE
nj.
NARAYANAN NAIR, LAKSHMI SADANAM, PINDIMANA KARA, PINDIMANA VILLAGE
JOY JOSEPH, KAROTHU HOUSE, MALAYANKEEZHU KOTHAMANGALAM
M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court