K.I.Baby v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses a civil revision petition as not maintainable because the High Court has already admitted a writ petition challenging the identical impugned order.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition No. 422 of 2006 is dismissed as not maintainable.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
THURSDAY, THE 5TH JUNE 2008 / 15TH JYAISHTA 1930
CRP.No. 422 of 2006()
-------------------------------(AGAINST ORDER IN OP.(ARBN)NO.6/1996 OF THE SUB COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA DTD. 7/3/2006)
REVISION PETITIONER: PETITIONER:
-------------------------------------------------------
K.I. BABY, KUNNEL HOUSE, KUNNACKAL P.O., MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.K.BABU THOMAS
RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS:
--------------------------------------------------
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil revision petition against an impugned order is maintainable when a writ petition challenging the same order is already admitted.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.I. Baby
- respondent
State of Kerala
- respondent
Superintending Engineer, KIP Circle
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court