The High Court of Kerala dismissed a Civil Revision Petition (CRP No. 2296 of 2002) as a consequence of the dismissal of the associated petition for condonation of delay, noting lack of representation and failure to address defects.
The Civil Revision Petition and Memorandum of Procedure were dismissed for failure to condone delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
MONDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 15TH MAGHA 1929
CRP.No. 2296 of 2002
---------------------- ( I.A.NO. 676 OF 1999 IN AS.18/1992 of DISTRICT COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA )
REVN. PETITIONER/PETITIONER/APPELLANT:
SHAKE HUSSAIN AHAMMED RAWTHER, NADUVILETHU VEEDU, KADAKADU MURI,
KARAMPALA VILLAGE, PANDALAM, ADOOR TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.T.M. ABDUL LATHEEF
RESPONDENTS/COUNTER PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS
BY
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 04/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
C.R.P. NO. 2296 OF 2002
ORDER ON C.M.P.NO. 5695 OF 2002 IN C.R.P. NO. 2296 OF 2002
DISMISSED.
04.02.2008
SD/- K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE.
/TRUE COPY/
P.A. TO JUDGE.
K.T. SANKARAN, J.
C.R.P. No. 2296 OF 2002
................................................................................... Dated this the 4th February, 2008
O R D E R
Consequent to the dismissal of the petition for condonation of delay in filing the
Civil Revision Petition, the Civil Revision Petition is also dismissed.
K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE.
lk
K.T. SANKARAN, J.
C.M.P. No. 5694 OF 2002 IN C.R.P. No. 2296 OF 2002
................................................................................... Dated this the 4th February, 2008
O R D E R
On 21.01.2008, two weeks' time was granted to cure the defects. No steps are taken till today. Today there is no representation for the petitioner when the case was called on two occasions. The petition for condonation of delay in filing the Civil Revision Petition is therefore dismissed.
K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE.
lk
K.T. SANKARAN, J.
C.R.P. No. 2296 OF 2002
Dated this the 4th February, 2008
O R D E R
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil revision petition filed without a condonation of delay petition should be entertained.
SHAKE HUSSAIN AHAMMED RAWTHER
GAURIAMMA RAJAMMA
G.VASUDEVAN NAMPOOTHIRI
REMESH
PREETHA
SINDHU
K.T. SANKARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
