Nabeesa v. Kader
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
THURSDAY, THE 14TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 25TH MAGHA 1929
CRP.No. 1961 of 2001
AGAINST THE COMMON ORDER DATED 05/03/2001 IN IA.NO.885/2001 AND 886/2001 IN OS.NO.402/1997 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, CHAVAKKAD
REVN. PETITIONER: PETITIONER: DEFENDANT:
NABEESA, AGED 64, W/O.PUTHUVEETTIL AIMMUTTY, PALUVAI DESOM, THAIKKAD AMSOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.M.K.DILEEP KUMAR
RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS: PLAINTIFFS:
R2 BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 14/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
-------------------------------------------C.R.P. NO. 1961 OF 2001 and C.M.P.NO. 4242 OF 2001 IN C.R.P.NO. 1961 OF 2001
-------------------------------------------Dated this the 14th February, 2008
O R D E R
On 10.1.2008, two weeks' time was granted as last chance to take necessary steps, though there was no representation for the petitioner. The defects are not yet cured. Today also there is no representation for the petitioner. C.M.P.No.4242 of 2001, petition for condoning the delay of 32 days in filing the Revision, is therefore, dismissed for default.
Consequent on the dismissal of the petition for condoning the delay in filing the Revision, the Civil Revision Petition is also dismissed for default.
(K.T.SANKARAN) Judge
ahz/
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
C.R.P.NO. 1961 OF 2001 and C.M.P.NO.4242 OF 2001 IN C.R.P.NO.1961 OF 2001
O R D E R
14th February, 2008 -------------------------------------------
Nabeesa
Kader
Saleem
K.T. Sankaran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court