State v. Mohammed
Case brief
What is this about?
State's Civil Revision Petition against Taluk Land Board order excluding 3.20 acres from ceiling limit dismissed. Court found finding justified as land purchased prior to 1970, thus out of ceiling computation.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 30TH JANUARY 2008 / 10TH MAGHA 1929
CRP.No. 1846 of 2001()
-------------------------------SMP.3/1997 of TALUK LAND BOARD, NILAMBUR ....................
REVN. PETITIONER:
-------------------------STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.R.BINDU
RESPONDENTS:
- ----------------------1. SRI.MOHAMMED ALIAS BAPUTTY, S/O. NELLANGADAN KUNHAMMED HAJI, VELLAYUR.
2. SRI.ABDUL RAFEEQUE, S/O. DO.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Revision Petition against the order of the Taluk Land Board excluding 3.20 acres from the declarant's account in the ceiling case lacks merit.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
State of Kerala, Rep. by the Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat, Thiruvananthapuram
- respondent
Mohammed alias Baputty
- respondent
Abdul Rafeeqe
- respondent
Moideen
- respondent
Unniachutty
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court