K.S.E.B v. Reena
Case brief
What is this about?
This revision petition was dismissed on the ground that the disputed amount had already been deposited by the petitioner and the award was satisfied, making it a fit case for no interference.
What did the court decide?
C.R.P. No. 1201 of 2005 dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 12TH DECEMBER 2008 / 21ST AGRAHAYANA 1930 CRP.No. 1201 of 2005() ---------------------OP.195/2001 of ADL.D.C. & MACT,THODUPUZHA .................... REVN. PETITIONER(S): PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
------------------------------------------------------KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, K.S.E.BOARD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SHRI. C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB
RESPONDENT(S): RESPONDENTS: --------------------------REENA, D/O. THOMAS, KAYATINKARA HOUSE, ARAKKULAM VILLAGE, THODUPUZHA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU SRI.THOMAS J.ANAKKALLUNKAL
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.P. BALACHANDRAN, J.
C.R.P. No.1201 OF 2005
Dated this the 12th December, 2008.
O R D E R
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kerala State Electricity Board
- respondent
REENA
Coram
K.P.BALACHANDRAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court