C.N.Prabhukaran v. Rajan
Case brief
What is this about?
The respondent had paid compensation but remained liable for imprisonment. The High Court, noting the petitioner's illness, directed him to surrender to the trial court for sentencing and recalled pending warrants.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner directed to appear before trial court on 17.3.08 to receive sentence; pending warrants of arrest recalled.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
TUESDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2008 / 14TH PHALGUNA 1929
Crl.MC.No. 858 of 2008()
-----------------------CRL.R.P.NO.234 OF 1999 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT
PETITIONER:
C.N.PRABHAKARAN, S/O.C.R.NANU, CHULLIPARAMBIL HOUSE, CHELAKOTTEKARA, THRISSUR - 5.
BY ADV. SMT.T.G.SALITHA
RESPONDENTS:
- RAJAN, S/O.AYYAPPAN, ASARIKUDY HOUSE, KARATTUPALLIKKARA, PERUMBAVOOR VILLAGE.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's imprisonment sentence should be deferred after he had paid the compensation but was unable to appear for surrender.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.N. PRABHAKARAN
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
V. RAMKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court