Rajamony v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Accused in SC/ST Act case sought direction to release bail on surrender. Court permitted surrender and directed filing of regular bail application within two weeks. Bail to be considered on merits same day if warrants exist, despite their pendency.
What did the court decide?
Court permitted petitioners to surrender before Magistrate and file application for regular bail within two weeks; bail to be considered on merits on same day as filing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD JANUARY 2008 / 3RD MAGHA 1929
Crl.MC.No. 253 of 2008()
CRIME NO. 57/2008 REGISTERED BY THE DYSP POLICE OF POLICE, IRINJALAKUDA
PETITIONER: ACCUSED:
- RAJAMANY, W/O. PARAMESWARAN, THOTTUNGAVALAPPIL HOUSE, ELINJIKKAPARAMBIL, MAVALASSERI VILLAGE, IRINJALAKUDA.
- MANOJ A.P., S/O. PARAMESWARAN, THOTTUNGAVALAPPIL HOUSE, ELINJIKKAPARAMBIL, MAVALASSERI VILLAGE, IRINJALAKUDA.
BY ADV. SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN
SRI.K.S.RAJESH
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether accused facing non-bailable warrants can apply for regular bail on surrender date.
Whether pendency of N.B. warrants prevents consideration of bail application filed by accused.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAJAMANY
- petitioner
MANOJ A.P.
- respondent
STATE
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court