M.a.Najam v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking quashing of proceedings in a cheque dispute where the petitioner is the second accused and has been absconding, the High Court of Kerala declined to quash the case. It directed the accused to surrender and apply for bail within two weeks for consideration. Quality: thin.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 16TH JANUARY 2008 / 26TH POUSHA 1929
Crl.MC.No. 159 of 2008()
-----------------------L.P. NO. 13/90 ARISING OUT OF CC.290/1989 of CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, TRIVANDRUM
PETITIONER: 2ND ACCUSED
M.A.NAJAM, MAHAR, MATTAPPALLY, NILAMEL P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT, PRESENTLY WORKING AT P.B.NO.1380, ALCOBAR, SOUDI ARABIA.
BY ADV. SRI.P.A.AHAMMED SRI.THOUFEEK AHAMED
RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to quash criminal proceedings in a cheque dispute where the accused has been absconding and investigation remains incomplete
Whether contrivancies in FIR and final report regarding receipt of money payments are sufficient to quash the trial
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
L.P. NO. 13/90
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
V. RAMKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court