K.S.Ramachandra Bhat v. K.S.Sadananda
Case brief
What is this about?
In this criminal leave petition, the appellant sought leave to appeal against an order of acquittal. The High Court refused leave, concluding that the evidence regarding the appellant's handwriting on the cheque was insufficient and that strong reasons existed to uphold acquittal.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT
WEDNESDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2008 / 4TH ASHADHA 1930
Crl.L.P..No. 580 of 2008()
-------------------------CC.1591/2005 of J.M.F.C.-I, KASARAGOD
: PETITIONER/COMPLAINT:-
K.S. RAMACHANDRA BHAT,
AGED 55 YEARS, S/O SUBRAYA BHAT, VAGETABLE MERCHANT, NULLIPADY, KASARGOD.
BY ADV. SRI.K.SHRIHARI RAO SMT.N.SHOBHA
RESPONDENTS:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal under Section 378(4) of the CrPC against a judgment of acquittal deserves to be granted.
Whether the trial court erred in not holding that the signature on the disputed cheque was that of the appellant.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.S. Ramachandra Bhat
- respondent
K.S. Sadananda
- respondent
P.A. Mohammed Haneefa
- respondent
State of Kerala
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court