Disposed

P.Mohanan v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC27 Jun 2008Con.Case(C)/685/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt of court case arising from non-compliance with a prior order in W.P.(C).19206/2007, the Kerala High Court held that no contempt was present. The proceedings were closed without prejudice to the petitioners' right to seek re-opening if future non-compliance is established.

What did the court decide?

Contempt of Court case closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to seek re-opening if directions are not complied with.

P.Mohanan Vs State of Kerala — Contempt of Court | Kerala HC (2008)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 27TH JUNE 2008 / 6TH ASHADHA 1930

¶5

Con.Case(C).No. 685 of 2008(S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C).19206/2007 DATED 1.1.08

¶6

PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN WP(C):

¶7

¶8

P. MOHANAN, AGED 59 YEARS,

¶9

SUPERINTENDENT OF SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS(RETIRED) "LINI NIVAS", CHAVASSERI P.O., KANNUR-670 702.

¶10

C. MOHANAN, AGED 59 YEARS, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SURVEY (RETIRED),VIGI NIVAS, MUTTANNUR, EDAYANNUR P.O., KANNUR-670 595.

¶11

A. SIVAKRISHNAN, AGED 58 YEARS,

¶12

DEPUTY DIRECTOR (RETIRED), COLLECTORATE,KASARAGOD, RUDRAKSHAM, THALIYIL, KALLIASSERI.

¶13

A.V. BALAKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, AGED 59 YEARS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR (RETIRED), OFFICE OF RE-SURVEY, KASARAGOD, SREYAS, NETTAMALOOR, PUZHALI.

¶14

M. BALAKRISHNAN, AGED 59 YEARS, HEAD SURVEYOR (RETIRED), COLLECTORATE, KANNUR, DILSHA, NIYARKUNNAV L.P.SCHOOL, ALVAIL.

¶15

BY ADV. SMT.I.SHEELA DEVI

¶16

RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 IN WP(C):

¶17

¶18

K.A. ABRAHAM, FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, WORKIONG AS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

¶19

RAVEENDRAN,

¶20

FATHERS NAME AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, WORKING AS DIRECTOR OF SURVEY & LAND RECORDS, DIRECTORATE OF SURVEY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶21

BY SPL.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.MANOJ KUMAR

¶22

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27/06/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶23

V.GIRI, J

¶24

C.O.C.685/2008

¶25

Dated this the 27^th day of June, 2008

¶26

JUDGMENT

¶27

I do not think that there is any contempt involved in this case. In view of the order passed in I.A.6226/2008 in W.P.(C).19206/2007, Contempt of Court case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioners to seek a re-opening of the same, if it is ultimately found that the directions issued in the judgment have not been complied with.

¶28

V.GIRI, Judge

¶29

mrcs

P.Mohanan v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Mohanan v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.R.Sarala and Others Vs v.R.Padmanabhan

Gracelett T.M. Vs Dr.Rajan Warrier

K.P.Mathew Vs State of Kerala

Baby Ouseph Xavier Vs State of Kerala

Jayasree Vs I.G. and Others

C.Richard Vs Director of Civil Supplies