In this contempt of court case, the Kerala High Court closed the proceedings after observing that the respondent had been given three months to pay dues, with interest liability specified for non-payment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
FRIDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2008 / 14TH POUSHA 1929
Con.Case(C).No. 1582 of 2007(S)
------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN OP.13104/1999 ....................
PETITIONERS
BY ADV. SRI.O.V.RADHAKRISHNAN (SR.) SMT.K.RADHAMANI AMMA
SRI.ANTONY MUKKATH
RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3
BY ADV. SRI.SIBY MATHEW
SRI.A.A.MOHAMMED NAZIR
GOVT.PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
KURIAN JOSEPH, J.
C.O.C. No.1582 of 2007
Dated this the 4th day of January, 2008
JUDGMENT
All that the second respondent needs is only three months' time to pay the dues to the petitioners. It is made clear that unless the amounts due to the petitioners are paid as stated in the affidavit, the petitioners shall be entitled to interest at the rate of 15% from the date of the judgment and the second respondent will be personally liable for the same.
With the above observation this Contempt of Court Case is closed.
(KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE)
ahg.
KURIAN JOSEPH, J.
C.O.C.No.1582 of 2007
JUDGMENT
4th January, 2008
E.Madhavan
R.Parameswaran Pillai
K.R.Muraleedharan
K.V.Vijayakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
