Order in a contempt case. Court closed the case without prejudice upon satisfaction that no further action is required under the Contempt of Courts Act.
Case closed without prejudice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN MONDAY, THE 11TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 22ND MAGHA 1929 Con.Case(C).No. 146 of 2008(S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.31157/2004 Dated 13/07/2007 ....................
PETITIONER: -------------
LATHA LALAN, W/O. LALAN, AGED 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT CC.18/2012-B, THUNDAPPARAMBIL HOUSE, RAMESWARAM VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK, KOCHUPALLI ROAD, THOPPUMPADI P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.K.BABU THOMAS
RESPONDENTS:
JOHNEY SEBASTIAN, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, SECRETARY, GREATER COCHIN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(GCDA), COCHIN-682 020.
BY ADV.SHRI E.S.M.KABEER SC FOR GCDA.
ADV. SRI.P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Contempt Case (C).No. 146 OF 2008
= = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 11th day of February, 2008. = = = = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = =
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has received a copy of the appeal memorandum in W.A. No. 363/08, filed by the GCDA against Annexure 1 judgment. I am therefore satisfied that no further action is called for under the Contempt of Courts Act, as of now. This case is hence closed without
prejudice.
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN
JUDGE
bkn/-
Latha Lalan
Johney Sebastian
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
