V.M.Raju v. Shri.T.P.Senkumar, IPS
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt proceeding, the Single Judge closed the matter without prejudice to the petitioner's right to challenge the subsequent order in a separate appeal.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed without prejudice to the petitioner's right to challenge the order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
FRIDAY, THE 24TH OCTOBER 2008 / 2ND KARTHIKA 1930
Con.Case(C).No. 1255 of 2008(S)
------------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.6689/2008
PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC :-
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
V.M.RAJU, S/O V.T. MARKOSE, AGED 56 YEARS, CONDUCTOR GR.II,(RETD) KSRTC, KUMALY AND RESIDING AT VAZHANGATTU HOUSE, CHINGAVANAM P.O., KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV. SRI.N.UNNIKRISHNAN
RESPONDENT(S):
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner may challenge the impugned order pending closure of the contempt petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.M. RAJU
- respondent
SHRI T.P. SENKUMAR
Coram
S. SIRI JAGAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court