Christopher v. Jose Cherian and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner in contempt proceedings sought closure of the case, submitting that the directions in prior orders (Annexures A1 and A4) had been complied with. The court closed the contempt case on admission.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed due to compliance with prior directions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND OCTOBER 2008 / 30TH ASWINA 1930
Con.Case(C).No. 1174 of 2008(S)
------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.16737/2008 AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A.NO.16737/2008 ....................
PETITIONER(S): ---------------
CHRISTOPHER, AGED 64, S/O. C.V. GEORGE, RESIDING AT PUTHEN BUNGALOW, ASHRAM, KOLLAM - 691 002.
BY ADV. SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ
RESPONDENT(S):
- JOSE CHERIAN, THE REEGIONAL DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, PANCHDEEP BHAVAN, NORTH SWARAJ ROUND, THRISSUR - 680 020.
- A. SAINULABDEEN, THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION, KURUMBELIL BUILDING, POLAYATHODU, KOLLAM - 691 021.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
CHRISTOPHER
- respondent
JOSE CHERIAN
- respondent
A. SAINULABDEEN
- respondent
TESSY MOL JACOB
- respondent
VISWANATHAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court