Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Leelamma Vs State of Kerala — Anticipatory Bail | Kerala HC (2008)

Home
Kerala HC
2008
Leelamma Vs State of KeralaLeelamma v. State of Kerala

Dismissed

Leelamma v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC20 Feb 2008Bail Appl./681/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single day order dismissing the petitioner's anticipatory bail application for lack of basis for her apprehension of arrest.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT

WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 1ST PHALGUNA 1929

Bail Appl..No. 681 of 2008() ----------------------------

PETITIONER/ACCUSED

LEELAMMA, W/O.BABY, AGED 52 YEARS, VILAYIL VEEDU, THEKKUMMURI, KIZHEKKEKARA MURI, S.R.P.M.POST, THAZHAVA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI. K.SIJU

RESPONDENTS:

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY S.I OF POLICE, KARUNAGAPPALLY POLICE STATION THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ADV.SRI.JAI GEORGE

Issues for consideration

2 issues framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest for alleged non-bailable offences.
2.
Whether the petitioner's apprehension of arrest has any basis.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
LEELAMMA, W/O.BABY
respondent
STATE OF KERALA

Coram

AI extract

R. BASANT

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 20 Feb 2008 · February
Registered: 29 Jan 2008
Case no.: Bail Appl./681/2008

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from R.basant

K.a.Aziz Vs the State of Kerala
19 Feb 2008
Shaijumon Vs State of Kerala
19 Feb 2008
Benny Vs State of Kerala
19 Feb 2008
Santhosh and Another Vs State of Kerala
20 Feb 2008

Cite this judgement

Leelamma v. State of Kerala, Bail Appl./681/2008 (KL), decided on 20 February 2008.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

R. BASANT

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Issue for consideration

Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest for alleged non-bailable offences. +1 more

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The apprehension of arrest by the petitioner was found to be without any basis. The bail application for anticipatory bail is dismissed. The public prosecutor had submitted that arrest was not required at that stage.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

R. BASANT, J.

B.A. No. 681 OF 2008 C

Dated this the 20^th day of February, 2008

O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. Petitioner apprehends

arrest on the allegation that she has committed non-bailable offences along with one Oommen alias Raju from whom she had purchased an item of property. Against the said Raju a crime has been registered.

The learned Public Prosecutor, after taking instructions, submits that the petitioner is not required to be arrested in that crime. If at any later stage, the petitioner is required to be arrested in the said crime, prior information shall be given to the petitioner and prior permission of this Court shall be taken, it is submitted.

The submissions of the learned Public Prosecutor are taken note of and are hereby recorded. The apprehension of the petitioner is found to be without any basis. This bail application is, in these circumstances, dismissed.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

aks

CNR

KLHC010007792008

Topic

Anticipatory Bail

Bench

Disposal

DISMISSED

Joseph @ Gold Joseph Vs State of Kerala & Anr.

20 Feb 2008

Benny Vs State of Kerala

20 Feb 2008