The court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail. While the petitioner was not arrested and the case was long-pending, the judge held that the existence of a non-bailable warrant and the petitioner's lack of prosecution interest meant it was not a fit case for bail.
No bail granted; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE K.HEMA MONDAY, THE 20TH OCTOBER 2008 / 28TH ASWINA 1930 Bail Appl..No. 5288 of 2008() ----------------------------CRIME NO. 161/1999 OF PARAVUR POLICE STATION PETITIONER/ACCUSED:-----------------------------RADHAKRISHNA KURUP S/O. JANARDHANAN PILLAI, PANAMOOTTIL VEEDU NEAR SREERAMAPURAM TEMPLE, MAVENAKONAM CHERRY KALLUVATHUKKAL VILLAGE
BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN
RESPONDENT(S): --------------STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PARAVUR POLICE STATION, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K. HEMA, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
B.A. No. 5288 of 2008
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 20th day of October,2008
O R D E R
Petition for anticipatory bail.
This petition is dismissed.
K.HEMA, JUDGE.
mn.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail is a fit case given the petitioner's lack of interest and pending non-bailable warrant.
Radhakrishna Kurup
State of Kerala
K HEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
