Sudhi v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Single Judge of Kerala High Court granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to petitioner accused in falling tree removal case, imposing conditions for appearance and interrogation.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner granted anticipatory bail under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. with conditions for appearance and interrogation.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.BASANT TUESDAY, THE 29TH JANUARY 2008 / 9TH MAGHA 1929
Bail Appl..No. 403 of 2008() ----------------------------
OR NO.2/07 OF AZHUTHA FOREST RANGE.
PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED
SUDHI, S/O RAGHAVAN, KUMBAPILLY HOUSE, THAPPIKADAVU BHAGOM, PEERMEDU.
BY ADV. SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN SRI.P.P.BIJU
RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT
THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. JAI GEORGE
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner facing allegations under the Kerala Forest Act.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUDHI
- respondent
THE STATE OF KERALA
Coram
R. BASANT
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court