Allowed

T.M.Sarojini v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC14 Mar 2008Bail Appl./1575/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Ernakulam granted anticipatory bail for a period of one month to the petitioner, a 77-year-old woman, who is the fourth accused in an IPC 304/34 case involving vehicular homicide. Conditions included surrendering for regular bail within the month and complying with standard bail requirements.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail for a period of one month liable to be cancelled on breach of conditions.

T.M.Sarojini Vs State of Kerala — Anticipatory Bail | Kerala HC (2008)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 14TH MARCH 2008 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1929

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 1575 of 2008()

¶6

----------------------------CRIME NO.512/2003 OF CITY TRAFFIC POLICE STATION, TRIVANDRUM

¶7

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

¶8

¶9

T.M. SAROJINI, AGED 77 YEARS, W/O. V.P. NATARAJAN, ARUL NIVAS, KARAKULAM (P.O), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695564.

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN

¶11

RESPONDENTS: STATE:

¶12

¶13

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶14

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JAI GEORGE

¶15

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶17

B.A. No.1575 of 2008

¶18

Dated:14.03.2008

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

In this petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the 4^th accused in Crime No. 512 of 2003 of City Traffic Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, for offences punishable under Section 304 read with Sec. 34 I.P.C. seeks anticipatory bail.

¶21

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶22

Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner who is a lady and other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the officer-in-charge of the police station concerned to release the petitioner on bail for a period of one month in the event of her arrest in connection with the above case on her executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the said officer and subject to the following conditions:-

¶23

B.A. NO.1575/2008

¶24

-:2:-

¶25

The petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

¶26

The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall she attempt to tamper with the evidence of the prosecution.

¶27

Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶28

The petitioner shall surrender before the concerned Magistrate within the above period of one month and seek regular bail.

¶29

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to her shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶30

This application is allowed as above.

¶31

V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

T.M.Sarojini v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.M.Sarojini v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakshmanan Vs State of Kerala

Geo & Others Vs State of Kerala

Abdul Muneer Vs Sub Inspector

Byju Vs State of Kerala

Abdul Rahiman Vs State of Kerala

Ramachandra Vs Excise Inspector