Appeal without active instruction was dismissed by the High Court of Kerala. A connected C.M.P. was also dismissed in a two-line order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
&
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
MONDAY, THE 17TH NOVEMBER 2008 / 26TH KARTHIKA 1930
AS.No. 157 of 1993(D)
---------------------
( OS.144/1990 of PRL.SUB COURT , THALASSERY )
APPELLANTS/ PLAINTIFFS 1 TO 13, 16 TO 22 & 32 TO 43:
AS.No. 157 of 1993(D)
AS.No. 157 of 1993(D)
AS.No. 157 of 1993(D)
ADV. SRI.K.P.SARVOTHAMAN
RESPONDENTS/ DEFENDANTS & PLAINTIFFS 23 TO 29, 31, & 44 TO 48.
AS.No. 157 of 1993(D)
AS.No. 157 of 1993(D)
AS.No. 157 of 1993(D)
AS.No. 157 of 1993(D)
*ADDL. RESPONDENT NOS. 61 TO 63 :
AS.No. 157 of 1993(D)
**_(ADDL. RESPONDENT NOS. 61 TO 63 ARE IMPLEADED AS THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE DECEASED 40TH RESPONDENT AS PER ORDER ON C.M.P. NO. 3931 OF 1996 DATED 21.11.1996._*
RESPONDENT NO.27 HAS NOT MARRIED. HENCE NO LEGAL HEIRS. LEGAL HEIRS OF RESPONDENT NO.38 ARE ALREADY ON THE PARTY ARRAY AS RESPONDENT NOS. 39 TO 43. MEMO HAS BEEN FILED TO THAT EFFECT ON 16.02.2004 VIDE C.F.NO. 1872 OF 2004.))
R5, R9, R13 TO 20 AND R26 BY ADV. SRI.K.R.BALASUBRAMANIAN R31, R50 TO 60 BY SRI.M.V.RAMACHANDRAN THAMPI R49 BY ADV. SHRI K.P. SARVOTHAMAN R39, R4O TO 43 BY ADV. SRI.V.RAJAGOPAL R7 AND R8 BY ADV. SRI.DAVIS J.CHIRAMEL R18 BY ADV. SRI.V.PREMCHAND
R2, R12, R22, R24, R30, R32, R34, R44 AND R45 BY ADV. SHRI G. MOHAN. BY ADV.SHRI G ANIL
THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17/11/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
KURIAN JOSEPH & K.T. SANKARAN, JJ.
.....................................................
A.S. No. 157 OF 1993
...................................................... Dated this the 17th November, 2008
J U D G M E N T
Kurian Joseph, J:
Learned counsel for the appellants reports no instruction.
Therefore, the Appeal is dismissed.
C.M.P.No. 407 of 1995 in A.S.No. 157 of 1993 is dismissed.
KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.
K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE.
lk
KURIAN JOSEPH & K.T. SANKARAN, JJ.
...................................................
A.S..No. 157 of 1993
................................................... Dated this the 17th November, 2008
J U D G M E N T
MRS. HYMA JOSEPH and other Appellants/Plaintiffs
MRS. VANITHA HARIS and other Respondents/Defendants & Plaintiffs
SHEELA PRAMODH and other Addl. Respondents
KURIAN JOSEPH
K.T. SANKARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
