S.Premlal v. Ksrtc
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought service benefits of his substantive post after being assigned light duty due to injury without Public Service Commission concurrence. Court directed Managing Director to consider representation.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH MARCH 2007 / 23RD PHALGUNA 1928
WP(C).No. 8490 of 2007(I)
PETITIONER:
S.PREMLAL, CONDUCTOR (ON OTHER DUTY AS STORE ISSUER) KSRTC DEPOT, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.ANANDARAJAN.N
SRI.K.K.MANGALANANDAN
RESPONDENTS:
1.THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-23.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, assigned light duty due to injury, is entitled to salary and benefits of his substantive post as Conductor despite self-reduced posting as Store Issuer.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. PREMLAL
- respondent
THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
Coram
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court