C.v.Hameed v. the Intelligence Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
Court considered writ petitions seeking directions to consider a request for documents regarding a penalty proposal under stage 2 rule hearing.
What did the court decide?
Ext.P4 request considered; copies of documents to be given at cost of petitioners before final orders.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN
THURSDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2007 / 14TH PAUSHA 1928
WP(C).No. 459 of 2007(D) ------------------------
PETITIONER: -----------C.V.HAMEED, PROPRIETOR, M/S.UNIVERSAL STEEL, V.P. 1/886A, MAROTTICHODU, W.VENGOLA P.O., 683 556.
BY ADV. DR.K.B.MUHAMED KUTTY (SR.) SRI.K.M.FIROZ
RESPONDENTS: -------------
THE INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, SQUAD NO.1, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTING ASST. COMMISSIONER (INT.), COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM.
BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI SOJAN JAMES
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/01/2007 ALONG WITH W.P.(C).NO.472/2007 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C).No.459 & 472/2007
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to obtain copies of documents sought before the final order is passed to ensure principles of natural justice.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.V. Hameed
- respondent
The Intelligence Officer, Squad No.1
Coram
P.R. Raman
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court