mother in favour of the 1st respondent-son by the Munsiff's Court was confirmed in appeal by the Subordinate Judge by Ext.P2 judgment. Even though Sri.M.R.Rajesh, counsel for the appellant addressed me fervently assailing Ext.P1 order of the Munsiff and Ext.P2 judgment of the Sub Judge, I am unable sitting in this jurisdiction under Article 227, which is narrow and visitorial in nature to say that Exts.P1 and P2 orders are vitiated by infirmity to such an extent as to warrant correction. But I notice that on 06.01.04, while admitting this Writ Petition, this Court passed an order of injunction restraining the respondents from obstructing the residence of the petitioner in the plaint schedule property. That order is in currency even now. Under these circumstances, I dispose of the writ petition itself directing the trial court to dispose of suits, OS No.340 of 2002 filed by the petitioner and OS No.348 of 2002 filed by the 1st respondent expeditiously. The learned Munsiff will not be influenced by his own order-Ext.P1 and the judgment of the lower appellate court-Ext.P2 while deciding the suits. Exts.P1 and P2 will be treated by the learned Munsiff as provisional and decision will
