Anirudhan v. Balakrishnan
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for default because no representation was filed, and the petitioner's counsel had shifted practice to another court.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed for default.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
MONDAY, THE 25TH JUNE 2007 / 4TH ASHADHA 1929
WP(C).No. 2660 of 2004(N)
------------------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER IN E.A.260,223/2003 IN EP.147/02 IN OS.144/1994 OF MUNSIFF COURT,ALUVA.
PETITIONER:
-------------------
ANIRUDHAN, S/O. KRISHNAN, KRISHNAVILASAM, THOTUMUGHAM, ALUVA.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MEETHIYAN KUNJU, SRI.K.SETHUNATH.
RESPONDENT:
----------------------
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anirudhan, S/O. Krishnan
- respondent
Balakrishnan, S/O. Parukutty Amma
Coram
Pius C. KuriaKOSE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court