A two-judge Bench of the High Court of Kerala dismissed an application for condonation of delay in filing a writ appeal. Consequently, the writ appeal was also rejected without addressing the merits.
Application for condonation of delay rejected; Writ Appeal dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH JULY 2007 / 13TH ASHADHA 1929
WA.No. 1496 of 2007
----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN OP.22182/1999 Dated 24/05/2006
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3 IN OP:
BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER MR.M.R.SABU
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS & RESPONDENTS 4 & 5 IN O.P:
R3 & R4 BY CGC MR.M.L.SURESH KUMAR
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 04/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
H.L.DATTU, C.J. & K.T.SANKARAN, J.
W.A.No.1496 of 2007 &
C.M.Appln.No.625 of 2007
Dated, this the 4th day of July, 2007
JUDGMENT
H.L.Dattu, C.J.
The order passed in O.P.No.22182 of 1999 dated 24th May, 2006 is the subject matter of this writ appeal.
the appeal. Therefore, the application requires to be rejected and it is rejected.
Consequently, the writ appeal is also rejected.
( H.L.DATTU) CHIEF JUSTICE
(K.T.SANKARAN) JUDGE
vns
2 issues framed by the court
Whether delay in filing writ appeal should be condoned.
Whether writ appeal filed against order in O.P.No. 22182 of 1999 should be retained.
STATE OF KERALA
SARADA UNNIKRISHNAN
V.P. RAMESH
UNION OF INDIA
H.L.DATTU
K.T.SANKARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
