This was a final order dismissing the Second Appeal for default because the appellant failed to cure defects within ten days despite being granted a last chance.
Second Appeal dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
THURSDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2007 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1929
SA.No. 758 of 1995
--------------------
( AS.31/1992 of PRL.SUB COURT, KOTTAYAM OS.630/1989 of ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTAYAM )
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT NO.1/PLAINTIFF:
K.N. NEELAKANTAN NAMBUDIRI, ADVOCATE RECEIVER OF SHALIMAR FINANCIERS, (IN LIQUIDATION) IN I.P. 20/87 OF SUB COURT, TRISSUR RESIDING AT KANDANCHATHA MANA, CHOOLASSERY VILLAGE, TRISSUR TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.V.SANKARA RAJA
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT & RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3/DEFENDANTS:
THIS SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/12/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T. SANKARAN, J.
................................................................................... S.A. No. 758 OF 1995 ................................................................................... Dated this the 13th December, 2007
J U D G M E N T
On 01.12.2007, ten days' time was granted to cure the defects as a last chance. It was also stated in the order that if the defects are not cured within that time, the Second Appeal will stand dismissed. The defects are not cured yet. Therefore, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default.
K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE.
lk
K.T. SANKARAN, J.
S.A. No. 758 of 1995
......................................................... Dated this the 13th December, 2007
J U D G M E N T
K.N. NEELAKANTAN NAMBUDIRI
K.C. MAMMEN
WILSON P. ANTONY
THOMAS JOHN
K.T. SANKARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
