O.S.Jesia v. R.O.Abdul Kalam
Case brief
What is this about?
Kerala High Court allowed two review petitions recalling a judgment because the original judgment misstated facts regarding borrower participation and guarantor status.
What did the court decide?
Review petitions allowed; judgment dating 08/12/2006 recalled.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
THURSDAY, THE 6TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 15TH BHADRA 1929
RP.No. 822 of 2007(I) --------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.31798/2006 Dated 08/12/2006 ....................
REVIEW PETITIONER/2ND RESPONDENT:
MRS. P.S.JESIA, STAR COTTAGE, COCHIN-682 035.
BY ADV. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN
RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER:
- MR.R.O. ABDUL KALAM, OOROTHU HOUSE, THRIKKADU VILLAGE, ALUVAYI (P.O), THRISSUR DISTRICT.
- THE FEDERAL BANK LTD., HEAD OFFICE, ALUVA, ERNAKULAM.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mrs. P.S. Jesia
- respondent
Mr. R.O. Abdul Kalam
- respondent
The Federal Bank Ltd.
- respondent
Mr. M.A. Sadique
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court