R.P. allowed only to clarify that the judgment did not preclude the Panchayat from shifting the bus stop location from the waiting shed to the opposite Canara Bank.
Clarified that the impugned judgment stands in no way of the Panchayat shifting the bus stop over to the proposed bus stop opposite Canara Bank.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE THURSDAY, THE 14TH JUNE 2007 / 24TH JYAISHTA 1929 RP.No. 530 of 2007() -------------------JUDGEMENT IN WPC.29314/2006 Dated 18/01/2007
REVIEW PETITIONERS:
BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR
RESPONDENTS: -------------
R1 TO R4 BY ADV. SRI.DEEPU THANKAN R5 & R6 BY ADV.SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON R7 & R8 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.SHYSON P.MANGUZHA.
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14/06/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.
R.P.NO.530 OF 2007 IN W.P.(C)No.29314 OF 2006
........................................................... DATED THIS THE 14TH JUNE, 2007
ORDER
Heard both sides.
(PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE)
tgl
WP(C)N0.
-2-
WP(C)N0.
-3-
MUSTHAFA KALATHIPADIKKAL
SACHIDANANDAN
M.M.SHAHUL HAMEED
MAJEED M
HANEEFA T
NILAMBUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT
PIUS C KURIAKOSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
