Petitioner counsel submitted the matter was infructuous; the court dismissed the original petition as infructuous without substantive reasoning.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 6TH SEPTEMBER 2007 / 15TH BHADRA 1929
OP.No. 3983 of 2000(Y)
--------------------------------
PETITIONER:
-------------------
SECRETARY, ATHURA SEVA SANGAM, SACHIVOTHAMAPURAM.P.O., KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY SRI. K.A. RAPPAI, KUNNATH HOUSE, KOODAPUZHA, CHALAKKUDI, TRICHUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.C.J.JOY.
RESPONDENTS:
------------------------
1. THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, PALAKKAD DIVISION, HEMAMBIKA NAGAR, OLAVAKKODE, PALAKKAD.
2. THE CUSTODIAN AND CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, (VESTED FORESTS), OLAVAKKODE CIRCLE, PALAKKAD.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. T.B. RAMANI.
THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06/09/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
O.P.No.3983 of 2000-Y
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Dated this the 6th day of September, 2007.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
matter has become infructuous. The Original Petition is hence
dismissed as infructuous.
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN,
JUDGE.
Sha/-
THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
O.P.No.3983 of 2000-Y
JUDGMENT
Dated: 6th September, 2007.
SECRETARY, ATHURA SEVA SANGAM
THE DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, PALAKKAD DIVISION
THE CUSTODIAN AND CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS
THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
