O.N.Gopi v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH MARCH 2007 / 23RD PHALGUNA 1928
OP.No. 2827 of 1997(J)
PETITIONERS:
-------------------
1. O.N.GOPI, JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT, BLOCK PANCHAYAT OFFICE, P.O. KOIPURAM, PULLAD, PATHANAMTHITTA,
2. P.S.THOMAS, JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT, VAZHAPPALLY GRAMA PANCHAYAT, P.O.KURISUMMOODU, CHANGANACHERRY.
BY ADV. SRI.N.SUGATHAN
SRI.A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PANICKER SRI.S.SANTHOSH KUMAR
RESPONDENTS:
----------------------
1. THE STATE OF KERALA REP.BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LOCAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.R.DEEPA
THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 14/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER ON CMP. NO.5127/21997 IN OP. 2827/1997.
DISMISSED
14.03.2007
SD/- KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
EXT.P1:- COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO.E2-20220/90 DT.30.5.91 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P1(a):- COPY OF THE COPY OF THE SENIORITY LIST APPENDED TO EST.P1 PROCEEDINGS.
EXT.P2:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.E1-120/95 DT.13.12.96 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P3l:- COPY OF THE ORDER NO.E2-27765/94 DT.20.6.95 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P4:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT.29.11.95 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS AND OTHER EXECUTIVE OFFICERS BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P5:- COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DT.12.2.96 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS AND TWO OTHER EXECUTIVE OFFICERS BEFORE THE HON: MINISTER FOR LOCAL ADMN.
/TRUE COPY/
tss
KURIAN JOSEPH, J.
O.P.No.2827 of 1997
Dated this the 14th day of March, 2007
JUDGMENT
The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayer:-
i) to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the respondents that promotion to the cadre of Special Grade Secretary shall be made on the basis of the ranking in the final seniority list of Executive Officers Grade I published in Ext.P1 proceedings.
There are other ancillary reliefs also. There is no counter affidavit.
Since the petitioners have represented their grievances before the Government as per Ext.P5, if no action has been taken on Ext.P5, there will be a direction to the first respondent to look into Ext.P5 with notice to the petitioners and take appropriate action in accordance with law, if not already taken within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of the judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
(KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE)
ahg.
KURIAN JOSEPH, J.
O.P.NO.2827/2007
JUDGMENT
14th March, 2007
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the promotion to Special Grade Secretary should be based on the final seniority list.
Whether the petitioners represented grievances to the Government and if further action was needed.
O.N. Gopi
P.S. Thomas
The State of Kerala
The Director of Panchayat
Kurian Joseph
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court