V.v.Sainaba v. the Deputy Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged recovery proceedings for loan arrears against a third respondent. Court dismissed the original petition noting the loan was admitted and recovery should continue.
What did the court decide?
Court directed respondents to proceed with recovery of the loan; objected raised before the first respondent before proceeding.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
TUESDAY, THE 27TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 6TH AGRAHAYANA 1929
OP.No. 2753 of 2002(C)
PETITIONER:
V.V.SAINABA, AGD 25 YEARS,
W/O. SIDHIQUE, VALIYAKATH VADAKKE NALAKATHU HOUSE, P.O.TANUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR
RESPONDENTS:
- THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY), TALUK OFFICE, TIRUR.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V.V.SAINABA
- respondent
THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (REVENUE RECOVERY), TALUK OFFICE, TIRUR
- respondent
THE VILLAGE OFFICER, TANUR
- respondent
KERALA STATE VANITHA VIKASANA CORPORATION LTD.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court